Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s recent proposal of a draft law equating corruption with treason during wartime, and advocating corresponding penalties, has ignited a flurry of contentious reactions. The announcement, delivered in an interview, has quickly triggered a wave of criticism.

The proposed legislation, if enacted, would grant the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) expanded authority to probe severe corruption cases, augmenting the functions of the National Anticorruption Bureau (NABU). This potential amplification of power has raised concerns over a potential consolidation of authority within the presidential office.

Zelensky shared his stance on conducting elections, expressing personal openness but acknowledging specific hurdles. He highlighted that existing laws prohibit holding elections during times of war. Halso touched upon the practical aspects of organizing elections, pointing out financial and technical considerations. He suggested that if Western countries, provided financial support to arrange the elections, it could be feasible. He underscored that these refugees in different parts of Europe also should not be denied the right to vote due to logistical limitations.

In sum, the possibility of holding elections during wartime hinges on a collaborative effort. This would entail partners sharing the financial burden, legislators enacting necessary changes, and creating accessible conditions for all eligible voters to exercise their rights.